Iroquois vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Iroquois
Chickasaw
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Iroquois
Chickasaw
26.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Chickasaw Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,224,284 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090 and weighted average of 26.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,787 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 8.3%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.2% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 35.2% | 62.8% |
Range | 30.1% | 56.3% |
Mean | 24.7% | 27.4% |
Median | 25.3% | 27.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.7% | 22.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.0% | 30.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households with Children
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Ottawa (26.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from France (26.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (26.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (26.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Estonian (26.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 26.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 26.2% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 26.2% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 26.1% |
Estonians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 26.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.1% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.1% |
Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.0% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 26.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Thailand (28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Panamanian (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (28.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |