Central American Indian vs Comanche Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Comanche
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Central American Indians
Comanche
17.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Comanche Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 299,936,739 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,456,343 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 7.7%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Comanche |
Minimum | 9.7% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 59.4% |
Range | 90.3% | 46.9% |
Mean | 43.3% | 29.8% |
Median | 36.0% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.8% | 18.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.8% | 40.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.0% | 22.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 27.4% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.2% | 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians and Comanche by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 2.3%), Creek (16.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Menominee (17.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.52%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |