Central American Indian vs Chinese Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Chinese
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Central American Indians
Chinese
3.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Chinese Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,061,009 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 13.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.88% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 15.5% | 11.0% |
Range | 14.6% | 10.4% |
Mean | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Median | 3.6% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 4.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 1.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Estonian (3.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Guamanian/Chamorro (3.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Serbian (3.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Ukrainian (3.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and Luxembourger (3.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Estonians | 2.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 3.3% |
Central American Indians | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 3.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 3.3% |
Serbians | 2.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 3.3% |
German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 3.3% |
Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 3.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 3.3% |
Samoans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |