Welsh vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Chickasaw
22.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,029,164 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 19.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 13.7% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 86.3% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 39.5% | 35.8% |
| Median | 30.2% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.7% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.3% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.5% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Thailand (22.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Spaniard (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Spanish (22.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
| English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spaniards | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Spanish | 4.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Dutch | 4.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 4.2 /100 | #236 | Tragic 22.0% |
| Vietnamese | 4.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 22.0% |
| French Canadians | 2.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 22.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |