Soviet Union vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Soviet Union
Ugandans
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,502 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 6.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Soviet Union | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.7% | 94.5% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 23.7% |
| Median | 18.1% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.9% | 17.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |