Luxembourger vs Czech Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Czech
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Czechs
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Czech Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,747,171 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 1.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Czech |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 7.7% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.3% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 22.6% | 33.2% |
| Median | 20.9% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 43.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 28.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 27.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 26.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Czechs by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Belgian (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Micronesia (13.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Spanish (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Somalia (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Belgians | 1.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Czechs | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Spanish | 1.0 /100 | #249 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Finns | 0.9 /100 | #252 | Tragic 13.6% |