Korean vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
Tsimshian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Tsimshian
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,036,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Korean | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 56.2% | 41.7% |
Range | 54.5% | 37.1% |
Mean | 17.8% | 23.7% |
Median | 16.1% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |