Immigrants from Hungary vs Chickasaw Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,645,999 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 24.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hungary	Chickasaw
Minimum	1.5%	1.9%
Maximum	29.4%	38.6%
Range	27.9%	36.7%
Mean	10.6%	18.1%
Median	9.8%	17.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.6%	14.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	11.8%	20.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	4.2%	6.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.1%	5.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.0%	5.9%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Welsh	91.6 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 12.7%
Puget Sound Salish	91.5 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Russia	91.2 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	90.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 12.7%
Sri Lankans	90.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 12.7%
Albanians	90.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 12.7%
New Zealanders	90.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| Hungary	90.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 12.7%
French Canadians	90.2 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 12.7%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	89.9 /100 \| #123	Excellent 12.7%
Immigrants \| Norway	89.3 /100 \| #124	Excellent 12.8%
Argentineans	89.1 /100 \| #125	Excellent 12.8%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	88.8 /100 \| #126	Excellent 12.8%
South Africans	88.4 /100 \| #127	Excellent 12.8%
Immigrants \| Belarus	88.2 /100 \| #128	Excellent 12.8%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 15.6%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 15.6%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 15.7%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 15.7%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 15.8%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 15.8%
Iroquois	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 15.8%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 15.9%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #271	Tragic 15.9%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #272	Tragic 15.9%
Haitians	0.0 /100 \| #273	Tragic 15.9%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 15.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 16.0%
Central Americans	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 16.0%
Bangladeshis	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 16.0%