Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Chickasaw
13.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
39.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,347,433 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 16.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.0% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 47.5% | 38.6% |
Range | 42.5% | 36.7% |
Mean | 14.3% | 18.1% |
Median | 12.9% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Uruguayan (13.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (13.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Portugal (13.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Cameroon (13.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (13.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 41.5 /100 | #186 | Average 13.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 41.0 /100 | #187 | Average 13.6% |
Hawaiians | 39.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 13.6% |
Uruguayans | 39.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 13.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 33.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 32.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 13.7% |
Iraqis | 31.8 /100 | #193 | Fair 13.7% |
Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |