French Canadian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
French Canadian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
French Canadians
Chickasaw
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,012,927 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.522 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 24.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | French Canadian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.4% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 49.1% | 38.6% |
Range | 44.7% | 36.7% |
Mean | 16.1% | 18.1% |
Median | 12.8% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.7% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and Sri Lankan (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |