Immigrants from Egypt vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Tsimshian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Tsimshian
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Tsimshian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,464,124 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,184,225 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 4.7% | 0.66% |
Maximum | 26.3% | 35.0% |
Range | 21.6% | 34.3% |
Mean | 11.5% | 14.1% |
Median | 11.2% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 20.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt and Tsimshian by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.72%), Ethiopian (11.2%, a difference of 0.74%), and Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |