Cree vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Cree
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Cree
Chinese
40.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,173,738 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cree and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113 and weighted average of 40.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 5.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cree | Chinese |
| Minimum | 7.1% | 12.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.9% |
| Range | 92.9% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 46.6% | 40.5% |
| Median | 45.4% | 39.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 32.0% | 35.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.8% | 42.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.8% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.4% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Demographics Similar to Cree by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Icelander (40.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (40.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Indonesian (40.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (40.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Laos (40.6%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 41.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 41.2% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 41.1% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 41.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 41.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 40.8% |
| Icelanders | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 40.8% |
| Cree | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 40.8% |
| Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 40.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 40.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 40.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 40.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 40.5% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 40.5% |
| Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 40.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Iraqi (38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (38.7%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 99.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Hmong | 99.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.1 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 38.7% |
| Iraqis | 98.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |