British West Indian vs Luxembourger Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
British West Indian
Luxembourger
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
British West Indians
Luxembourgers
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Luxembourger Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,852,012 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.060%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British West Indian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 3.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 38.5% | 48.3% |
Range | 35.3% | 44.3% |
Mean | 14.6% | 22.6% |
Median | 13.3% | 20.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.3% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 33.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians and Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.18%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 1.2 /100 | #246 | Tragic 13.5% |