British West Indian vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
British West Indian
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
British West Indians
Chickasaw
39.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British West Indian vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,687,142 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.119 and weighted average of 39.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 17.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British West Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 24.4% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 63.5% | 68.4% |
| Range | 39.1% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 42.4% | 48.9% |
| Median | 41.4% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.0% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.4% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Lumbee (39.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Puerto Rican (39.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Yup'ik (39.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Black/African American (39.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and Cape Verdean (39.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |