Czech vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Chickasaw
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,041,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 37.7%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.55% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 33.0% |
| Range | 49.5% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 15.0% |
| Median | 8.7% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Greece (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (9.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |