Immigrants from Poland vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Chickasaw
9.8%
MALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,660,101 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 38.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 22.5% | 33.0% |
| Range | 20.2% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 15.0% |
| Median | 7.5% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Macedonian (9.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Iranian (9.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Czech (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Tongan (9.7%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Danes | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Macedonians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.5 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Iranians | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Czechs | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.2 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Russians | 99.2 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Cypriots | 99.2 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |