Immigrants vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Chickasaw
12.0%
MALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 575,955,105 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 12.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 68.2% | 33.0% |
| Range | 61.1% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.0% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from the Azores (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Moroccan (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (12.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Malaysian (12.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.0%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Spaniards | 13.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.7% |
| Aleuts | 10.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 9.8 /100 | #203 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 8.5 /100 | #204 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Panamanians | 6.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 5.4 /100 | #206 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Malaysians | 5.2 /100 | #207 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #208 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 4.3 /100 | #209 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Moroccans | 4.2 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.0 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |