Norwegian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Chickasaw
9.5%
MALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,206,209 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 41.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 33.0% |
Range | 47.6% | 30.8% |
Mean | 9.8% | 15.0% |
Median | 8.9% | 14.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 18.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |