Immigrants from France vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from France
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from France
Chickasaw
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
75.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from France vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,760,426 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 24.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from France | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.1% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 63.6% | 33.0% |
| Range | 60.5% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 14.5% | 15.0% |
| Median | 9.5% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.7% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from France by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |