Armenian vs Pakistani Male Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Pakistani
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Pakistanis
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Pakistani Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,692,153 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,136,890 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 3.2% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 20.1% | 32.7% |
| Range | 16.9% | 32.0% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 11.2% |
| Median | 9.9% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Pakistanis by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Guamanian/Chamorro (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |