Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Chickasaw
43.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,363,036 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.457 and weighted average of 43.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 7.3%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 61.4% | 68.4% |
| Range | 61.3% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 43.6% | 48.9% |
| Median | 44.7% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.9% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.3% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Nigeria (43.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Colville (43.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Nigerian (43.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Yaqui (43.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Indonesian (43.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |