Panamanian vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Panamanian
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Panamanians
Chickasaw
45.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Panamanian vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,208,339 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210 and weighted average of 45.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 2.9%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Panamanian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 5.5% | 27.5% |
Maximum | 78.4% | 68.4% |
Range | 72.9% | 40.9% |
Mean | 46.8% | 48.9% |
Median | 46.8% | 49.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 44.6% | 45.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.2% | 54.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Portugal (45.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Thailand (45.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Kenyan (45.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Mexican (45.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Morocco (45.4%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Houma | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 45.5% |
Marshallese | 7.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 45.5% |
Alaska Natives | 7.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 45.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 45.5% |
German Russians | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 45.5% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 45.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 45.4% |
Panamanians | 4.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 45.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 3.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 45.2% |
Kenyans | 3.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 45.2% |
Mexicans | 3.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 2.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 45.1% |
Immigrants | Laos | 2.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 45.0% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 2.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 45.0% |
French American Indians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 45.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |