Crow vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Crow
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Crow
Chickasaw
40.4%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,208,662 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.370 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 15.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 18.8% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 85.8% | 68.4% |
| Range | 67.0% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 43.0% | 48.9% |
| Median | 42.2% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.5% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.8% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.3% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Crow by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from Dominica (40.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Barbados (40.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Arapaho (40.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Senegalese (40.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and Barbadian (40.6%, a difference of 0.65%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 40.7% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 40.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 40.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 40.6% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 40.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 40.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |