Belizean vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Belizean
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Belizeans
Chickasaw
42.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,212,972 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 42.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 10.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belizean | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 23.5% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 70.1% | 68.4% |
| Range | 46.6% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 42.9% | 48.9% |
| Median | 42.8% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.2% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.1% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Liberian (42.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Honduras (42.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Cheyenne (42.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Yemen (42.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Menominee (42.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |