French American Indian vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
French American Indian
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
French American Indians
Chickasaw
45.0%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
2.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,975,724 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.358 and weighted average of 45.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 3.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French American Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 12.6% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 62.4% | 68.4% |
| Range | 49.8% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 44.1% | 48.9% |
| Median | 45.8% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 42.2% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Immigrants from Uganda (45.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Laos (45.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Comanche (45.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American (45.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (45.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Panamanians | 4.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 3.5 /100 | #219 | Tragic 45.2% |
| Kenyans | 3.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 45.2% |
| Mexicans | 3.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 45.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 2.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 45.1% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 2.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 2.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 45.0% |
| French American Indians | 2.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 45.0% |
| Cree | 1.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.9% |
| Nepalese | 1.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |