Bhutanese vs Costa Rican Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Costa Rican
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Costa Ricans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Costa Rican Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.12%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 36.6% | 41.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 89.7% |
Range | 63.4% | 48.2% |
Mean | 69.5% | 68.7% |
Median | 69.4% | 68.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Costa Ricans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |