Bhutanese vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from the Azores
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,257,310 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.33%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from the Azores |
Minimum | 36.6% | 54.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.4% | 45.1% |
Mean | 69.5% | 70.1% |
Median | 69.4% | 69.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 64.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 75.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from the Azores by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), and Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |