Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Indonesia Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Indonesia
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Indonesia
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
63rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Indonesia Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,720,751 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.052 and weighted average of 66.0%, a difference of 0.19%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Indonesia |
Minimum | 36.6% | 42.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 85.4% |
Range | 63.4% | 42.7% |
Mean | 69.5% | 69.1% |
Median | 69.4% | 69.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 63.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 76.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Indonesia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |