Bhutanese vs American Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
American
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Americans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs American Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 581,387,036 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.53%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | American |
Minimum | 36.6% | 43.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.4% | 56.1% |
Mean | 69.5% | 68.2% |
Median | 69.4% | 66.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 65.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 69.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Americans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Guyana (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lebanon (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cambodia (65.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Egyptians | 99.4 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 65.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 65.3% |