Bhutanese vs Australian Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Australian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Australians
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Australian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,034,220 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 4.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Australian |
| Minimum | 36.6% | 31.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.4% |
| Range | 63.4% | 50.9% |
| Mean | 69.5% | 64.8% |
| Median | 69.4% | 64.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 60.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 70.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Denmark (62.9%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (62.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Estonian (62.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (62.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and British West Indian (62.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Ottawa | 0.3 /100 | #277 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 0.2 /100 | #278 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.2 /100 | #279 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 0.2 /100 | #280 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Estonians | 0.2 /100 | #281 | Tragic 62.9% |
| New Zealanders | 0.1 /100 | #282 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 0.1 /100 | #283 | Tragic 62.9% |
| Australians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Mongolians | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 62.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Latvians | 0.1 /100 | #287 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 0.1 /100 | #288 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 0.1 /100 | #289 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 62.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 62.6% |