Bhutanese vs Native/Alaskan Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Native/Alaskan
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Natives/Alaskans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Native/Alaskan Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,654,863 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 66.4%, a difference of 0.76%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 36.6% | 49.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 90.0% |
Range | 63.4% | 40.1% |
Mean | 69.5% | 68.3% |
Median | 69.4% | 67.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 72.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Natives/Alaskans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Afghan (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Colombia (66.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (66.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |