Bhutanese vs African Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
African
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Africans
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs African Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,598,671 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 6.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | African |
Minimum | 36.6% | 32.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.4% | 67.4% |
Mean | 69.5% | 62.8% |
Median | 69.4% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 58.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 66.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Demographics Similar to Africans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Chippewa (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Iroquois (62.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |