Jordanian vs Costa Rican Family Households
COMPARE
Jordanian
Costa Rican
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Jordanians
Costa Ricans
65.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Costa Rican Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,395,405 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.432 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.59%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Jordanian | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 52.5% | 41.4% |
Maximum | 87.5% | 89.7% |
Range | 35.0% | 48.2% |
Mean | 69.1% | 68.7% |
Median | 67.5% | 68.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.6% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Jordanians and Costa Ricans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Lebanon (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Guyana (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |