Immigrants from Lebanon vs Costa Rican Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Costa Rican
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Costa Ricans
65.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Costa Rican Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,130,535 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,469,677 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.63%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 51.8% | 41.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 89.7% |
Range | 48.2% | 48.2% |
Mean | 68.9% | 68.7% |
Median | 67.4% | 68.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 63.7% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.2% | 71.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Costa Ricans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Immigrants from Guyana (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |