Bhutanese vs Fijian Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Fijian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Fijians
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
66th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Fijian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,947,966 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.673 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.080%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Fijian |
Minimum | 36.6% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 91.4% |
Range | 63.4% | 82.6% |
Mean | 69.5% | 67.3% |
Median | 69.4% | 67.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 63.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 72.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 14.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Fijians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Pima (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |