Immigrants from Sudan vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Soviet Union
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Soviet Union
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
87.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,954,451 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.64%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 8.5% | 6.1% |
| Range | 7.5% | 5.1% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan and Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (2.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |