Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Sudan
Chickasaw
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sudan vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,961,882 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 37.6%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sudan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 22.1% | 56.8% |
| Range | 17.5% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 22.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sudan by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), South African (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 77.3 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Sudanese | 77.1 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 76.4 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |