Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Costa Rican
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Costa Ricans
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Costa Rican Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,795,005 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.775. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.244% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 244.5 Costa Ricans.
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,638, a difference of 6.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $103,989, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,622, a difference of 3.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $95,565, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $46,645, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Good $44,090 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Good $103,989 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Excellent $87,262 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Average $46,645 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Average $54,279 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Average $39,622 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $53,106 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Good $95,565 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Good $102,779 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Good $61,638 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Good 25.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.3%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 9.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Good 16.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Good 16.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Average 29.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 11.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Good 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Average 82.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 14.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Fair 32.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 56.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 95.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 94.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Poor 64.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Fair 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Average 37.7% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Average 15.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 1.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Costa Rican Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.2%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Costa Rican |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Excellent 22.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Excellent 2.4% |