Zimbabwean vs Colville Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Colville
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Colville

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,752
SOCIAL INDEX
15.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
289th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Colville Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,392,369 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Colville within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.361% in Colville. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 361.3 Colville.
Zimbabwean Integration in Colville Communities

Zimbabwean vs Colville Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,474, a difference of 29.6%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $70,094, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,792, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,774, a difference of 3.0%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $37,514, a difference of 8.7%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $42,151, a difference of 14.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Income
Income MetricZimbabweanColville
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$38,047
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$85,792
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$70,094
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$42,151
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$48,516
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$37,514
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$49,774
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$82,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$82,474
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$51,739
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
21.3%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 93.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 69.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 68.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 36.4%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 37.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanColville
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
29.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
24.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
29.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
39.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
18.3%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 92.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 87.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanColville
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
16.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
29.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
11.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.4%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanColville
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
59.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
81.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
79.5%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 58.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanColville
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
41.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
8.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
45.3%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 73.1%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 51.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 27.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanColville
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
13.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
86.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
25.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
11.1%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 52.2%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 49.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanColville
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Excellent
96.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
29.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Zimbabwean vs Colville Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Colville communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 179.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 88.2%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 15.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Colville Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanColville
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
30.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
55.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%