Zimbabwean vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,668,992 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 15.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $29,031, a difference of 57.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $70,989, a difference of 55.0%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $59,159, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 17.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $42,380, a difference of 20.9%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $33,046, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 190.5%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 141.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 122.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 43.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 48.3%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 62.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 118.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 116.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 105.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 79.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.6%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 87.9%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 83.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 63.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 60.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 21.3%).