Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Sudanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Sudanese
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sudanese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,617,464 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 246.2 Sudanese.
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $84,401, a difference of 16.8%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $78,529, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $93,718, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $38,215, a difference of 6.8%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $44,419, a difference of 8.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $46,982, a difference of 9.1%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $41,695 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $96,783 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $78,529 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $44,419 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $51,216 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $38,215 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $46,982 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $84,401 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $93,718 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $58,281 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 23.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 19.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Fair 12.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.45%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Exceptional 68.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 42.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Excellent 83.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.1% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 6.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 60.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Fair 32.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 53.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 33.8%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Good 66.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Good 47.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Sudanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Sudanese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Good 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.2% |