Marshallese vs Potawatomi Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Potawatomi
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Potawatomi
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Potawatomi Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,469,521 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,014,628 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 4.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Potawatomi |
| Minimum | 7.9% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.1% | 96.6% |
| Mean | 38.6% | 28.9% |
| Median | 23.3% | 24.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.4% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 73.5% | 40.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.1% | 23.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.7% | 17.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.3% | 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Potawatomi by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.78%), Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are American (15.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Ute (15.7%, a difference of 0.57%), Yakama (15.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |