Immigrants from Asia vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,014,921 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 12.2%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Asia	Turkish
Minimum	1.2%	0.78%
Maximum	16.6%	16.2%
Range	15.4%	15.5%
Mean	5.1%	4.6%
Median	4.6%	3.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.9%	2.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.6%	4.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.7%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.3%	3.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.3%	3.5%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%

Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Scottish	99.8 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 4.3%
Swiss	99.8 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.8 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 4.3%
Serbians	99.8 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 4.3%
British	99.8 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.8 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 4.3%
Australians	99.7 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 4.3%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 4.3%
Burmese	99.7 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	99.7 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 4.3%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 4.3%
Welsh	99.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 4.3%
Austrians	99.7 /100 \| #54	Exceptional 4.3%
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%