Immigrants from Asia vs Indian (Asian) Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,014,921 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.291 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,935,416 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Asia	Indian (Asian)
Minimum	1.2%	1.7%
Maximum	16.6%	16.6%
Range	15.4%	14.9%
Mean	5.1%	5.3%
Median	4.6%	4.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.9%	3.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.6%	6.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	1.7%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.3%	2.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.3%	2.9%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Indians (Asian) by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Egyptian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are White/Caucasian (4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Romanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%
Romanians	92.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	92.5 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Asia	92.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.8%
Egyptians	92.0 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%