Irish vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Irish
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Irish
Turks
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Irish vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 563,529,593 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Irish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 3.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Irish | Turkish |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 16.2% |
| Range | 99.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 4.6% |
| Median | 4.6% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.9% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.8% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Irish and Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Irish are Dutch (4.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Greek (4.2%, a difference of 0.48%), Estonian (4.2%, a difference of 0.59%), European (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and English (4.2%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and British (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |