Immigrants from Asia vs Turkish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Turkish
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Turks
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Turkish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,172,468 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 2.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 0.67% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 22.9% |
| Range | 63.7% | 22.2% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 10.0% |
| Median | 10.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Turks by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Europe (12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Scandinavian (12.1%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |