Nepalese vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Nepalese
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Nepalese
Turks
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nepalese vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,514,690 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Nepalese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 51.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Nepalese | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.73% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 19.9% | 16.2% |
Range | 19.2% | 15.5% |
Mean | 7.5% | 4.6% |
Median | 5.8% | 3.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 4.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Nepalese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nepalese are Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |