Menominee vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Menominee
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Menominee
Turks
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Menominee vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,721,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 21.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Menominee | Turkish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 16.2% |
| Range | 18.9% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 4.6% |
| Median | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Menominee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Marshallese (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ukraine (5.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
| Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
| Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
| Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
| Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
| Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |