Cherokee vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Turkish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Turks
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Turkish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 33.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Turkish |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 54.5% | 16.2% |
| Range | 51.1% | 15.5% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 4.6% |
| Median | 7.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 3.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |