Immigrants from Asia vs Turkish Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Turkish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Turks
11.2%
POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Turkish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,468,106 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,706,785 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.3%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Turkish |
Minimum | 3.7% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 55.6% | 20.5% |
Range | 51.8% | 18.0% |
Mean | 11.3% | 9.0% |
Median | 10.0% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Turks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Swiss (11.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Austrian (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Ukrainian (11.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Italy (11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (11.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Germans | 98.1 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ukrainians | 97.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.2% |